tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post4057603758374490618..comments2023-10-25T10:45:54.660-05:00Comments on Answers in Genesis BUSTED!: William Lane Craig Q & AAIGBustedhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03232781356086767207noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post-17252942247874230782018-03-19T21:52:04.967-05:002018-03-19T21:52:04.967-05:00Ditto to Paul DeMottDitto to Paul DeMottAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06564511661459193867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post-64237449124424317982013-01-31T19:29:35.349-06:002013-01-31T19:29:35.349-06:00Lol At Guy with an Eye. Even the most prominent ph...Lol At Guy with an Eye. Even the most prominent philosophers would agree that William Craig is intelligent. If you don't think his arguments required reason, then you probably weren't smart enough to understand them. Even more embarrassingly, Craig has won many debates, and if he's not using reason then why aren't the atheists easily beating him?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17934856342685618655noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post-87141072523970987202012-05-30T22:44:07.341-05:002012-05-30T22:44:07.341-05:00Hi Francisco,
I think Craig is like the lawyer Jo...Hi Francisco,<br /><br />I think Craig is like the lawyer Johnny Cochran; He's a smooth-talking snake oil salesman with a talent for arguing. In fact, he's so good at arguing that he can "win" an argument even when he is completely and utterly wrong. I think those who are sharp enough to slow down and think about what he is really saying and to research what the real facts are won't be nearly as persuaded by what he says. For example, I bet if you picked a dozen new testament scholars and asked them whether Jesus' resurrection was a fact or faith issue, they'd admit it was the latter, and this would even be true concerning many traditional scholars. Dale Allison admits this much, and there was a conservative scholar on a TV show called Penn and Teller's Bullshit! who admitted this (you can watch this episode on youtube, look up "Penn Teller Bible"). Think about that: biblical scholars don't think of Jesus' resurrection as something proven by the facts, but Craig seems to think it is and has even shammed many of his uncritical teenage fanboys into fiercely (and naively) believing it. Now how could Craig have done that? Is it because Craig's beliefs must be right or because he is a smooth talking public debater?AIGBustedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03232781356086767207noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post-85927906005622115182012-05-30T16:38:30.589-05:002012-05-30T16:38:30.589-05:00Wow! Flew cleaned Craig's clock? Arif opened u...Wow! Flew cleaned Craig's clock? Arif opened up quite well but clearly not a debater of Craig's caliber. Now Kagan definitely cleaned Craig's clock in the Q & A. My question would be this? why do atheists fail so miserably against Craig when he has presented the same arguments for like 20 years????Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01485008973023003179noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post-55887319193838939302011-07-25T22:05:16.001-05:002011-07-25T22:05:16.001-05:00If you think he fared poorly against Flew (which I...If you think he fared poorly against Flew (which I disagree with) then I guess you'd at least have to cede that he lost the battle but won the war.Nicolehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16022208036916630539noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post-52835810399017954882010-04-07T14:53:24.621-05:002010-04-07T14:53:24.621-05:00Flew cleaned Craig's clock? Really? I read the...Flew cleaned Craig's clock? Really? I read the transcript of that debate, and while the comments by other philosophers (Rowe and Martin especially) that were published alongside the transcript rocked, Flew's speeches were rambled and didn't address most of what Craig said. <br /><br />But I second what Guy says. If an atheist debater just did basic things like challenge Craig whenever Craig tried to change the subject, etc. Craig would be in big trouble. He might still win in a debate on the existence of God because of his ability to cram lots of points in to a short amount of time, but he'd loose on any more manageable subject, like morality or the resurrection.The Uncredible Hallqhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09565179884099473943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post-9700709887818761412010-04-07T12:59:54.801-05:002010-04-07T12:59:54.801-05:00I saw quite a few of his debates on youtube, and w...I saw quite a few of his debates on youtube, and was quite disappointed in the side of reason.<br /><br />I went to his website and challenged him to a debate. lol Sadly he declined. <br /><br />His arguments are avoid and change the subject. I can not stand the cretin. We need someone to call his BS as BS instead of trying so hard to be respectful. He is an idiot and should be treated/mocked as such.Semi-sagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09365054062343087590noreply@blogger.com