tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post6957526743748692101..comments2023-10-25T10:45:54.660-05:00Comments on Answers in Genesis BUSTED!: AiG Writer Irrational, Hypocritcal, and HystericalAIGBustedhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03232781356086767207noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post-50607791551745955492009-09-28T18:42:14.120-05:002009-09-28T18:42:14.120-05:00But Where ARE the intermediates?? All I read was ...But Where ARE the intermediates?? All I read was basically a rationalization (scientific sounding tho it was) for no intermediate species or sub species or whatever. They don't exist. Actually, I must agree with anonomyous that it takes much more faith to believe in evolution than in a creator. "the earth shall declare His glory!"Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02047817287784597741noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post-36566990979249027382009-07-19T09:22:14.239-05:002009-07-19T09:22:14.239-05:00Karl Popper (20th Century epidemiologist) expresse...Karl Popper (20th Century epidemiologist) expressed that the first desire of any scientist should be, that following the making of the theory, they should design and do an experiment that proves their very theory to be wrong, and in doing so they do their best to advance knowledge. Yet we do not see this in the theory of Evolution. Instead we find people clinging to a hope in the face of million year old tissue. Wish I had your faith. <br /><br />You ask for information to be created out of chance. But you need to have a language first and a language is only usable if you have a system to read it. (translate it for that matter). mRNA tRNA, ribosomes, something to link tRNA to amino acids, DNA transcriptase, (I know you can cut out some of this it you say life started with RNA) But even then you need all of this at once to start the whole process. On top of that you some how have to get the information for creating all this into the the very information that you start with. WOW you got faith. <br /><br />I wish you all the best and thank you for call Christian out when they miss quote and use incorrect information.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post-91028688892691422212007-12-19T11:29:00.000-06:002007-12-19T11:29:00.000-06:00I don't think I will respond to people who are too...I don't think I will respond to people who are too puss to leave their names.AIGBustedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03232781356086767207noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post-3911704150531757742007-12-19T04:31:00.000-06:002007-12-19T04:31:00.000-06:00Evolution is taught in our public schools because ...<I><BR/>Evolution is taught in our public schools because the evidence supports it strongly.</I><BR/><BR/>Where is this evidence you speak of? <BR/>I was taught evolution for 20 years, never was any proof whatsoever presented. <BR/><BR/>Later monkey!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post-12302268028893410192007-12-13T20:16:00.000-06:002007-12-13T20:16:00.000-06:00Beyond Darwin and Intelligent Design:www.starlarva...Beyond Darwin and Intelligent Design:<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.starlarvae.org" REL="nofollow">www.starlarvae.org</A>Star Larvaehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07461123659751257133noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6802109362344250457.post-37020650842674229402007-12-11T07:45:00.000-06:002007-12-11T07:45:00.000-06:00One thing I find particularly interesting is that ...One thing I find particularly interesting is that the original article has a callout box that advertises Behe's "Darwin's Black Box" -- the book from which the notion of Irreducible Complexity emerged. The description reads:<BR/><BR/><I>This easy-to-read book does a top notch job of explaining one of the most vexing problems in biology: the origin of the complexity that permeates all of life. Behe, a professor in biochemistry who is not a Biblical creationist, comes to the conclusion that at a biochemical level, scientists have no option but to believe in intelligent design.</I><BR/><BR/>Even though Behe has been proven wrong in pretty much ALL of his examples, they're STILL citing this incorrectly.Aaronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02907462646559254985noreply@blogger.com