Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Craig's Fallacious Response to Dawkins

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think science has already proven the existence of God. An infinite source is the source of Creation; however, if the source did not have a mind then the universe would still be in the act of Creation; however, it isn't. Therefore, the infinite source has a mind that could stop the act of Creation being infinite himself.

Craig is correct; however, all you have to do is look at science and reason to discover that the Creator has already been demonstrated.

HERP said...

Asserting that an infinite source is the source of creation and then making an incoherent claim about the mind and act of creation does not, in anyway way or form demonstrate that science has proven the existence of god

Tell us your how the creator has been demonstrated, keeping in mind the scientific method. We'll be waiting.

Robert Morane said...

An infinite source is the source of Creation; however, if the source did not have a mind then the universe would still be in the act of Creation

It does not follow.

However, let's have fun --

If the Universe was created for man, then the act of creation would be over, for man exists. But since the universe is still expanding, it is still in the act of being created, for expansion is the means of creation. Therefore, the universe was not created for man, and therefore, Judeo-Christianity is false.

Next...